By Barry Roche on 31 Mar 2026
Why Half of Senior Leaders Fail
Research shows that between 40% and 50% of senior leaders fail to meet expectations within 18 months of promotion or appointment. The base rate of leadership derailment is 50%. Half.
The reasons rarely involve competence. They almost always involve behaviour under pressure.
A leader starts dominating conversations. Another withdraws when challenged. Someone else makes impulsive decisions to regain control. These shifts often go unnoticed initially because results still look strong. But over time, they erode trust, destabilise culture, and create confusion about what the business actually values.
By the time the patterns reach the surface, the damage is done. Disengaged teams. Frustrated investors. A successor inheriting a toxic dynamic.
When profiling senior teams, I consistently see the same gap: the leader thinks they're being decisive, but the team experiences them as overbearing. The leader believes they're maintaining standards, whilst the team sees micromanagement. The distance between how leaders see themselves and how others experience them is where derailment lives.
What the Hogan Development Survey Actually Reveals
Unlike most assessments that measure how people behave when things are going well, the HDS focuses on what happens when they're not. It identifies derailers or strengths taken too far under stress:
- Bold: confidence that becomes arrogance
- Diligent: attention to detail that turns into perfectionism
- Cautious: risk awareness that becomes indecision
- Mischievous: charm that shifts into manipulation
- Excitable: passion that becomes volatility
Every leader has a unique pattern of these traits. The insight comes from understanding which ones emerge under pressure and how they affect the people around you.
For example, someone high on Excitable and Bold might be passionate and confident under normal conditions. But under sustained pressure (which at senior levels is constant), they become volatile and dismissive of others' input.
categorises stress responses into three types: Moving Away (withdrawing from conflict), Moving Against (becoming aggressive or controlling), and Moving Toward (becoming overly agreeable or dependent). Everyone has a default pattern. Most leaders have never been told what theirs is.
Why Self-Awareness Is So Difficult at the Top
The higher you rise, the fewer people tell you the truth.
This is particularly dangerous because the traits that got you promoted often become liabilities at the next level. The gap between identity (how you see yourself) and reputation (how others see you) is what destroys careers.
The purpose of assessments like the HDS isn't to label or judge. It's to show leaders how they actually show up under pressure, as opposed to how they think they show up.
Turning Awareness Into Action
Identifying derailers is only useful if you do something about them.
The most effective approach isn't trying to eliminate these patterns. They're part of your personality. It’s about building systems and awareness to manage them.
Someone prone to overcontrol might delegate key decisions during high-pressure periods. A leader who withdraws when criticised might schedule structured feedback sessions to stay engaged. Someone who becomes impatient under stress might build in buffer time before making major decisions.
This isn't soft skills development. It's protecting performance under pressure.
When leaders understand their dark side patterns, they can:
- Anticipate their own stress reactions. Rather than being caught off guard by their behaviour, they can predict when certain patterns are likely to emerge and prepare for them.
- Build complementary teams. If you know you become overly controlling under pressure, you can deliberately include people who'll push back. If you tend to avoid conflict, you can ensure someone on your team is comfortable with difficult conversations.
- Create personal early warning systems. Specific triggers often precede derailer behaviours. Recognising them means you can intervene before the damage happens.
The Organisational Impact
When senior leaders understand and manage their dark sides, the benefits extend throughout the business. Culture strengthens because people feel safe to challenge ideas rather than walking on eggshells. Succession planning improves because leadership risk becomes visible rather than hidden until it's too late. Performance stabilises because behaviour under pressure becomes predictable and managed rather than volatile.
The result is an organisation that performs consistently, rather than one that swings between brilliance and chaos depending on how much pressure the leadership team is under.
Turning Insight Into Advantage
Everyone carries strengths and weaknesses. Pretending the weaknesses don't exist, or that they won't emerge under pressure, is what causes trouble. At RSG, we believe that the cost of derailment: lost talent, damaged culture, destroyed value… is far higher than the discomfort of honest self-assessment.
Want to understand how your leadership team behaves under pressure? Get in touch to discuss how we can help you maintain consistency when it matters most.




